Platform Labor Governance, Gig Economy Transformation, and Urban Economic Resilience: Comparative Institutional Analysis of the United States and the European Union, 2020–2026
Keywords:
gig economy; platform labor; digital economy; labor governance; United States; European Union; platform capitalism; algorithmic management; labor transformation; economic resilienceAbstract
This article examines platform labor governance and gig economy transformation through a comparative institutional analysis of the United States and the European Union between 2020 and 2026. The study argues that the platform economy should be understood not merely as a technological labor-market innovation but as a broader institutional restructuring process affecting employment relations, urban service systems, organizational strategy, labor governance, and socio-economic resilience. The United States and the European Union provide analytically significant comparative cases because both possess highly developed platform economies, yet they differ substantially in labor regulation, welfare systems, digital governance, and institutional approaches toward platform work. The United States emphasizes market flexibility, entrepreneurial labor models, and decentralized regulation, whereas the European Union increasingly emphasizes labor protection, algorithmic accountability, and platform-worker rights. The findings indicate that platform-based labor systems improve market efficiency and service accessibility only when governance systems align innovation incentives with worker protection, institutional trust, and regulatory adaptability. This article contributes to economics and business scholarship by conceptualizing platform labor ecosystems as institutional governance systems linking digital markets, organizational strategy, labor transformation, and socio-economic resilience.