| FOCUS AND SCOPE |
| EDITORIAL BOARD |
| REVIEWER |
| AUTHOR GUIDELINES |
| PEER REVIEW |
| PUBLICATION ETHICS |
| COPYRIGHT NOTICE |
| AUTHOR FEE |
| CONTACT US |
| INFORMATION |
| FOR READERS |
| FOR AUTHORS |
| FOR LIBRARIANS |
| INDEXING |
 |
| ISSN : XXXX-XXXX |
 |
| JOURNAL TEMPLATE |
 |
| TOOLS |
     |
Peer Review
Peer Review Process
Allogio : Journal of Law, Education and Economic Development applies a peer-review process to ensure the quality, originality, validity, relevance, and academic contribution of every manuscript submitted to the journal. The peer-review process is conducted to maintain scholarly standards and support the publication of high-quality articles in the fields of law, education, economics, public policy, social sciences, and development studies.
All manuscripts submitted to Allogio : Journal of Law, Education and Economic Development will be evaluated through editorial screening and peer review before publication. The review process is conducted objectively, fairly, confidentially, and professionally.
Initial Editorial Screening
After submission, each manuscript will first be checked by the editorial team to ensure that it complies with the journal’s focus and scope, author guidelines, manuscript template, citation style, writing format, and publication ethics.
At this stage, the editor may reject manuscripts that are not relevant to the scope of the journal, do not follow the author guidelines, contain serious formatting problems, have a high similarity index, or do not meet the basic academic standards required by the journal.
Similarity Check
All submitted manuscripts may be checked using similarity detection software. Manuscripts that indicate plagiarism, duplicate publication, excessive similarity, improper citation, or unethical use of sources may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected by the editorial team.
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their manuscripts are original and that all sources used in the research are properly cited.
Peer Review Method
Allogio : Journal of Law, Education and Economic Development uses a peer-review system in which submitted manuscripts are reviewed by qualified reviewers who have expertise relevant to the topic of the manuscript.
Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on originality, relevance, academic quality, methodological accuracy, clarity of analysis, validity of findings, strength of argument, contribution to knowledge, and the suitability of references.
Review Criteria
Reviewers are expected to assess manuscripts based on the following criteria:
- Relevance of the manuscript to the journal’s focus and scope.
- Originality and novelty of the research.
- Clarity of research objectives and problem formulation.
- Suitability of research methods or analytical approach.
- Accuracy and depth of analysis.
- Validity and reliability of findings.
- Strength of legal, educational, economic, or development-related arguments.
- Contribution to law, education, economics, public policy, social sciences, or development studies.
- Clarity of writing, structure, tables, figures, and presentation.
- Appropriateness and relevance of references.
- Compliance with publication ethics.
Reviewer Recommendation
After completing the review process, reviewers may provide one of the following recommendations:
- Accepted without revision.
- Accepted with minor revision.
- Accepted with major revision.
- Resubmission for review.
- Rejected.
The final decision regarding manuscript acceptance or rejection is made by the editor based on reviewers’ comments, manuscript quality, author revisions, ethical considerations, and the journal’s editorial policy.
Revision Process
Authors who receive revision requests must revise their manuscripts according to the comments and recommendations provided by reviewers and editors. The revised manuscript must be resubmitted within the time specified by the editorial team.
Authors are expected to provide clear responses to reviewers’ comments and explain the changes made in the revised manuscript. Authors who disagree with certain reviewer comments must provide a clear, polite, and academic explanation.
Editorial Decision
The editorial team has the authority to make the final decision on all submitted manuscripts. Editorial decisions may include acceptance, revision, resubmission, or rejection.
The editor’s decision is final and is based on academic quality, reviewer recommendations, ethical considerations, manuscript suitability, and the journal’s publication standards.
Confidentiality
All manuscripts submitted to Allogio : Journal of Law, Education and Economic Development are treated as confidential documents. Editors and reviewers are not allowed to disclose, discuss, copy, distribute, or use the manuscript content for personal purposes before publication.
Reviewers must maintain confidentiality throughout the review process and must not share the manuscript with other parties without permission from the editor.
Conflict of Interest
Editors and reviewers must disclose any potential conflict of interest related to the manuscript, authors, institutions, funding sources, or research topic. If a conflict of interest exists, the editor or reviewer must withdraw from handling or reviewing the manuscript.
Review Timeline
The peer-review process generally takes several weeks, depending on reviewer availability, manuscript complexity, editorial workload, and the quality of revisions submitted by the authors.
The journal is committed to conducting the review process as efficiently and professionally as possible while maintaining academic quality, fairness, and ethical standards.
Final Statement
By submitting a manuscript to Allogio : Journal of Law, Education and Economic Development, authors agree to follow the journal’s peer-review process and accept editorial decisions made based on academic evaluation, reviewer recommendations, publication ethics, and the journal’s editorial policy.